Шрифт:
Интервал:
Закладка:
3333
Bonnefon J.-F., Shariff A., Rahwan I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles / Science, Vol. 352, Iss. 6293, pp. 1573—1576 // https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654
3334
Марков А. (2018). Моральные проблемы беспилотных автомобилей не имеют универсального решения / Элементы, 29.10.2018 // https://elementy.ru/novosti_nauki/433355/Moralnye_problemy_bespilotnykh_avtomobiley_ne_imeyut_universalnogo_resheniya
3335
Awad E., Dsouza S., Kim R., Schulz J., Henrich J., Shariff A., Bonnefon J.-F., Rahwan I. (2018). The Moral Machine experiment / Nature, Vol. 563, pp. 59—64 // https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6
3336
Марков А. (2018). Моральные проблемы беспилотных автомобилей не имеют универсального решения / Элементы, 29.10.18 // https://elementy.ru/novosti_nauki/433355/Moralnye_problemy_bespilotnykh_avtomobiley_ne_imeyut_universalnogo_resheniya
3337
McKinsey & Company (2023). The state of AI in 2023: Generative AI’s breakout year // https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2023-generative-ais-breakout-year#/
3338
Tangermann V. (2023). Artists Sue Stable Diffusion and Midjourney for Using Their Work to Train AI That Steals Their Jobs / Futurism, Jan 18, 2023 // https://futurism.com/artists-sue-stabile-diffusion-midjourney
3339
Lee T. B. (2023). Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal earthquake for AI. / Ars Technica, 4/3/2023 // https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/stable-diffusion-copyright-lawsuits-could-be-a-legal-earthquake-for-ai/
3340
* DeviantArt — популярный сервис обмена изображениями и социальная сеть; в конце 2022 г. DeviantArt выпустил собственный генератор изображений DreamUp, основанный на модели Stable Diffusion.
3341
Franzen K. (2023). Midjourney, Stability AI and DeviantArt win a victory in copyright case by artists — but the fight continues / VentureBeat, October 30, 2023. // https://venturebeat.com/ai/midjourney-stability-ai-and-deviantart-win-a-victory-in-copyright-case-by-artists-but-the-fight-continues/
3342
Vincent J. (2022). YouTuber trains AI bot on 4chan’s pile o’ bile with entirely predictable results / The Verge, Jun 8, 2022 // https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/8/23159465/youtuber-ai-bot-pol-gpt-4chan-yannic-kilcher-ethics
3343
Papasavva A., Zannettou S., De Cristofaro E., Stringhini G., Blackburn J. (2020). Raiders of the Lost Kek: 3.5 Years of Augmented 4chan Posts from the Politically Incorrect Board // https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07487
3344
Kurenkov A. (2022). Lessons from the GPT-4Chan Controversy. / The Gradient, 12.JUN.2022 // https://thegradient.pub/gpt-4chan-lessons/
3345
Condemning the deployment of GPT-4chan (2022). // https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdh3Pgh0sGrYtRihBu-GPN7FSQoODBLvF7dVAFLZk2iuMgoLw/viewform?fbzx=1650213417672418119
3346
Lin S., Hilton J., Evans O. (2021). TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods // https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07958
3347
Kelley D. (2023). AI-Based Cybercrime Tools WormGPT and FraudGPT Could Be The Tip of the Iceberg. / SlashNext, August 1, 2023 // https://slashnext.com/blog/ai-based-cybercrime-tools-wormgpt-and-fraudgpt-could-be-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/
3348
Николич А. (2023). EVILdolly // https://huggingface.co/AlexWortega/EVILdolly
3349
Levin J.-C., Maas M. M. (2020). Roadmap to a Roadmap: How Could We Tell When AGI is a 'Manhattan Project' Away? // https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.04701
3350
Bengio Y., Deleu T., Hu E. J., Lahlou S., Tiwari M., Bengio E. (2021). GFlowNet Foundations // https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09266
3351
Koetsier J. (2022). Building an artificial brain: 86B neurons, 500T synapses, and a neuromorphic chip / YouTube, Mar 9, 2022 // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEymRJb0dso
3352
Yadlowsky S., Doshi L., Tripuraneni N. (2023). Pretraining Data Mixtures Enable Narrow Model Selection Capabilities in Transformer Models // https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00871
3353
Reilly M. (2006). Calculating the speed of sight / New Scientist, 28 July 2006. // https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9633-calculating-the-speed-of-sight/
3354
Levy S. (2000). Insanely Great: The Life and Times of Macintosh, the Computer that Changed Everything. Penguin Books // https://books.google.ru/books?id=Y6ZQAAAAMAAJ
3355
Engelbart D. C. (1962). Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. SRI Summary Report AFOSR-3223 // https://www.dougengelbart.org/content/view/138
3356
Wolfram S. (2023). Remembering the Improbable Life of Ed Fredkin (1934–2023) and His World of Ideas and Stories / Stephen Wolfram writings, August 22, 2023 // https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/08/remembering-the-improbable-life-of-ed-fredkin-1934-2023-and-his-world-of-ideas-and-stories/
3357
Wolfram S. (2023). Remembering the Improbable Life of Ed Fredkin (1934–2023) and His World of Ideas and Stories / Stephen Wolfram writings, August 22, 2023 // https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/08/remembering-the-improbable-life-of-ed-fredkin-1934-2023-and-his-world-of-ideas-and-stories/
3358
Fredkin E. (1963). The time sharing of computers / Computers and Automation, November 1963, pp. 12—20 https://usermanual.wiki/Manual/196311.1084983735.pdf