Efron, John M. 1994. Defenders of the Race: Jewish Doctors and Race Science in fin-du-siecle Europe. New Haven.

Elias, Norbert. 1989. Studien über die Deutschen. Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M.

Elias, Norbert. 1974. “tte Sciences: Toward a Heory”, in: Whitley, Richard (Ed.) Social Processes of Scientific Development. London. P. 21–44.

Elias, Norbert. 1971. “Sociology of Knowledge: New Perspectives”, Sociology 5. P. 149–168 & 335–370.

Elster, Jon. 1979. “Risk, Uncertainty and Nuclear Power”, in: Social Science Information 18. P. 371–400.

Elzinga, Aant. 1995. “Shaping Worldwide Consensus: He Orchestration of Global Climate Change Research”, in: Aant Elzinga and Catharina Landström (Eds.) Internationalism in Science. London: Taylor and Graham. P. 223–255.

Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”, in: Journal of Communication 43 (4). P. 51–58.

Eriksson, Johan. 2005. “Molding Minds Rather than Form Policy: How to Make Research Useful”, in: International Studies Perspectives 6. P. 51–71.

Eriksson, Johan. 1999. “Observers or Advocates: On the Political Role of Security Analysts”, in: Cooperation and Conflict 34. P. 311–330.

Eulau, Heinz. 1973. “Social Revolution and the Consultive Commonwealth”, in: American Political Science Review 67. P. 169–191.

Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. 1997. Race and the Enlightenment. A Reader. Oxford.

Ezrahi, Yaron. 1980. “Utopian and Pragmatic Rationalism: tte Political Context of Scientific Advice”, in: Minerva 18. P. 111–131.

Fairchild, Henry Pratt. 1932. “tte Possibility, Character and Functions of Applied Sociology”, in: Social Forces II. P. 182–187.

Farman, J. C., B. G. Gardiner and J. D. Shanklin. 1985. “Large Losses of Total Ozone in Antarctica Reveal Seasonal ClO /NO Interaction”, in: Nature 315. P. 207–210.

Feuer, Lewis S. 1963. The Scientific Intellectual. New York.

Feuer, Lewis S. 1954. “Causality in the Social Sciences”, in: The Journal of Philosophy 51. P. 681–695.

Finkelstein, Norman. 1997. “Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s ‘Crazy’ tte-sis: A Critique of Hitler’s Willing Executioners”, in: New Left Review 224. P. 39–87.

Fischer, Eugen. 1913. Die Rehobother Bastards und das Bastardisierungsproblem beim Menschen. Anthropologische und ethnographische Studien am Rehobother Bastardvolk in Deutsch-Südwestafrika. Jena.

Fischer, Frank. 1990. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. London: Sage.

Fiske, Donald W. 1986. “Specifity of Method and Knowledge in Social Sciences”, in: Fiske, Donald W., and Shweder, Richard A. (Eds.) Metha-theory in Social Science. Pluralism and Subjectivities. Chicago. P. 61–82.

Fitzgibbons, Athol. 1988. Keynes’ Vision. A New Political Economy. Oxford.

Flyvbjerg, Brent. 1998. Rationality and Power. Democracy in Practice. Chicago.

Flyvbjerg, Brent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and how it can Succeed Again. Cambridge.

Föger, Benedikt, und Taschwer, Klaus. Die andere Seite des Spiegels. Konrad Lorenz und der Nationalsozialismus. Wien.

Freeman, Christopher. 1977. “Economics of research and development”, in: Ina Spiegel-Rösing and Derek de Solla Price (Eds.) Science, Technology and Society: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. P. 223–275.

Freeman, Howard S. 1963. “йе Strategy of Social Policy Research”, in: Social Welfare Forum. New York.

Freiburg, Jeanne. 1993. “Counting Bodies: üe Politics of Reproduction in the Swedish Welfare State”, in: Scandinavian Studies 65. P. 226–36.

Fourier J. B. J. 1824. “Remarques generales sur les temperatures du globe terrestre et des espaces planetaires”, in: Annales de Chimie et de Physique. Vol. 27. P. 136–167.

Fuller, Steve. 1992. “Knowledge as Product and Property”, in: Stehr, Nico, and Ericson, Richard V. (Eds.) The Culture and Power of Knowledge. Inquiries into Contemporary Societies. Berlin. P. 157–190.

Funtowicz, Silvio O. and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the PostNormal Age”, in: Futures 25 (7). P. 735–755.

Funtowicz, Silvio O. and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science Policy. Dordrecht.

Furner, Mary O. 1975. Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905. Lexington, Keng-tucky.

Furner, Mary O. 1996. “Social Scientists and the State: Constructing the Knowledge Base for Public Policy, 1880–1920”, in: Fink, Leon, and Leonard, Stephen T., and Reid, Donald M. (Eds.) Intellectuals and Public Life. Ithaca. P. 145–181.

Furner, Mary O., and Supple, Barry (Eds.) 1990a. The State and Economic Knowledge. The American and British Experiences. Cambridge.

Furner, Mary O., and Supple, Barry. 1990b. “Ideas, Institutions, and the State in the United States and Britain: An Introduction”, in: Furner, Mary O., and Supple, Barry (Eds.) The State and Economic Knowledge. The American and British Experiences. Cambridge. P. 3–39.

Galbraith, John K. 1971. A Contemporary Guide to Economics, Peace and Laughter. London.

Galbraith, John, K. 1973. “Power and the Useful Economists”, in: The American Economic Review 63. P. 1–11.

Galton, Francis [1892] 1962. Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences. London.

Gans, Herbert J. 1975. “Social Science for Social Policy”, in: Horowitz, Irving L. (Ed.) The Use and Abuse of Social Science. New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Garfinkel, Harold. 1988. “Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order”, in: Sociological Theory 6. P. 103–109.

Garver, Kenneth L., andBettylee Garver. 1991. “Historical Perspectives: Eugenics – Past, Present, and the Future”, in: American Journal of Human Genetics 49. P. 1109–1118.

Gergen, Kenneth J. 1986. “Correspondence versus Uatonomy in the Language of Understanding Human Acion”, in: Fiske, Donald W., Shweder, Richard A. (Eds.) Metatheory in Social Science. Pluralisms und Subjectivities. Chicago. P. 136–162.

Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Cambridge.