42. Kimber, M. L. et al. (2021). Health outcomes after pregnancy in elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 53 (8), 1739–1747.

43. Jacobson, L. T. et al. (2018). Breastfeeding history and risk of stroke among parous postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7 (17), e008739.

44. Tschiderer L. et al. (2022). Breastfeeding is associated with a reduced maternal cardiovascular risk: systematic review and meta-analysis involving data from 8 studies and 1 192 700 parous women. Journal of the American Health Association, 11, e022746.

45. Quashie, N. T. et al. (2019). Childlessness and health among older adults: variation across five outcomes and 20 countries. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76 (2), 348–359.

46. Lacroix, C. (2018). Comparing the relative mitigation potential of individual pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1398–1407.

47. Wynes, S. & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12 (7), 074024.

48. Mundaca, L. et al. (2018). Demand-side approaches for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. Energy Efficiency, 12, 343–362.

49. Halstead, J. & Ackva, J. (2020). Climate & lifestyle report. Founder Pledge. https://founderspledge.com/stories/climate-and-lifestyle-report

50. Bradshaw, C. J. et al. (2021). Underestimating the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 1, 615419.

51. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2022). World population prospects 2022: summary of results. http://www.unpopulation.org/

52. Jarzebski, M. P. et al. (2021). Ageing and population shrinking: implications for sustainability in the urban century. NPJ Urban Sustainability, 1, 17.

53. Ord, T. (2014). Overpopulation or underpopulation? In: Is the planet full? Ed. by Goldin, Oxford University Press.

54. Blau, F. D. & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: extent, trends, and explanation. Journal of Economic Literature, 55 (3), 789–865.

55. Женщины и мужчины России. 2020: Стат. сб. / Росстат. М., 2020.

56. Magnusson, C. & Nermo, M. (2017). Gender, parenthood and wage differences: the importance of time-consuming job characteristics. Social indicators Research, 131, 797–816.

57. International Labour Organization (2019). A quantum leap for gender equality. For a better future of work for all. Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/--dgreports/--dcomm/--publ/documents/publication/wcms_674831.pdf

58. Cukrowska-Torzewska E. & Matysiak, A. (2020). The motherhood wage penalty: a meta-analysis. Social Science Research, 88–89, 102416.

59. Бирюкова С., Макаренцева А. (2017). Оценки “штрафа за материнство” в России. Население и экономика, 1 (1), 50–70.

60. Kwak, E. (2022). The emergence of the motherhood premium: recent trends in the motherhood wage gap across the wage distribution. Review of Economics of the Household, 1, 1–21.

61. Henrik, K. et al. (2018). Children and gender inequality: evidence from Denmark. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper Series, 24219.

62. Plotnick, R. (2009). Childlessness and the economic well-being of older Americans. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 64 (6), 767–776.

63. Deming, S. M. (2022). Beyond measurement of the motherhood penalty: how social locations shape mothers’ work decisions and stratify outcomes. Sociology Compass, 16 (6), e12988.

64. Krapf, M. et al. (2017). Parenthood and productivity of highly skilled labor: evidence from the groves of academe. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 140, 147–175.

65. Richards, R. J. (2022). Instinct. In: Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, еd. by Vonk & Shackleford, Springer International Publishing.

66. Lonstein, J. S. et al. (2015). Common and divergent psychobiological mechanisms underlying maternal behaviors in non-human and human mammals. Hormones and behavior, 73, 156–185.

67. Glocker, M. L. et al. (2009). Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women. PNAS, 106 (22), 9115–9119.

68. Wang, T. & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2016). How consumers respond to cute products. In: The Psychology of Design: Creating Consumer Appeal, еd. by Batra, Seifert & Brei, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

69. Mattson, B. J. & Morrell, J. I. (2005). Preference for cocaine-versus pup-associated cues differentially activates neurons expressing either Fos or Cocaine- and Amphetamine-regulated transcript in lactating, maternal rodents. Neuroscience, 135 (2), 315–328.

70. Fletcher, G. J. O. et al. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: the curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10 (1), 20–36.

Глава 2. Замороженные деточки: будущее наступило

1. La Marca, A. et al. (2012). Normal serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the general female population and the relationship with reproductive history. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 163, 180–184.

2. Goswami, M. & Nikolaou, D. (2017). Is AMH level, independent of age, a predictor of live birth in IVF? Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 10 (1), 24–30.

3. Visser, J. A. et al. (2006). Anti-Mullerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function. Reproduction, 131 (1), 1–9.

4. Taylan, E. et al. (2019). Current status of germline stem cells in adult mammalian ovary. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 20, S63 – S66.

5. Steiner, A. Z. et al. (2016). Impact of female age and nulligravidity on fecundity in an older reproductive age cohort. Fertility and Sterility, 105 (6), 1584–1588.

6. Thurston, L. et al. (2019). Investigation and management of subfertility. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 72 (9), 579–587.

7. Fleming, R. et al. (2015). Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Mullerian hormone. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 31, 486–496.

8. Wallace, W. H. B. & Kelsey, T. W. (2010). Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. PLOS One, 5 (1), e8772.

9. Laufer, N. et al. (2004). Successful spontaneous pregnancies in women older than 45 years. Fertility and Sterility, 81 (5), 1328–1332.

10. Gleicher, N. et al. (2018). Older women using their own eggs? Issue framed with two oldest reported IVF pregnancies and a live birth. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 37 (2), 172–177.

11. Yeh, J. S. et al. (2014). Pregnancy outcomes decline in recipients over age 44: an analysis of 27,959 fresh donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertility and Sterility, 101 (5), 1331–1336.

12. Salmeen, K. et al. (2011). The oldest gravidas: a review of pregnancy risks in women over 45. Obstetrical & Gynecological survey, 66 (9), 580–590.

13. Simchen, M. J. et al. (2006). Pregnancy outcome after age 50. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108 (5), 1084–1088.

14. McIntyre, H. D. et al. (2019). Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 5 (1), 47.

15. Calhaz-Jorge, C. et al. (2020). Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embtyology (ESHRE). Human Reproduction Open, 1, hoz044.

16. Farquhar, C. et al. (2018). Intrauterine insemination with